Mathis v. Citizens DeKalb Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mathis v. Citizens DeKalb Bank

278 S.E.2d 500, 157 Ga. App. 693, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1972

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 27, 1981

Docket61142

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 278 S.E.2d 500 (Mathis v. Citizens DeKalb Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathis v. Citizens DeKalb Bank, 278 S.E.2d 500, 157 Ga. App. 693, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1972 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant, inter alia, complains that the trial court erred in entering a judgment confirming the sale of real property under power without first finding the facts specifically and in failing to state separately his conclusions of law, as required by Code Ann. § 81A-152. The trial court’s order fails in this regard. Pruitt v. First Nat. Bank of Habersham County, 142 Ga. App. 100 (235 SE2d 617) (1977).

The judgment below is vacated and the trial court is directed to enter a new judgment based on findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a). All rights of appeal are preserved.

Judgment vacated with direction.

Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur. [694]*694Decided February 27, 1981. Robert A. Bartlett, for appellants. Lucian Lamar Sneed, Leon W. Clifton, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI