Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mathis v. BE & K Construction

Mathis v. BE & K Construction

681 So. 2d 871, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10936, 1996 WL 600381
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 1996
DocketNo. 95-4518
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 681 So. 2d 871 (Mathis v. BE & K Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathis v. BE & K Construction, 681 So. 2d 871, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10936, 1996 WL 600381 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of the possibility that future developments may render the claimant eligible for permanent total disability benefits at some later time, we delete the words “with prejudice” from the first paragraph of the decretal portion of the order appealed here. Davis v. Bonded Transportation, Inc., 573 So.2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). We affirm the order as modified.

Affirmed.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
681 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
681 So. 2d 871, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10936, 1996 WL 600381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-be-k-construction-fladistctapp-1996.