Mathis v. BE & K Construction
681 So. 2d 871, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10936, 1996 WL 600381
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 1996·No. No. 95-4518·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In light of the possibility that future developments may render the claimant eligible for permanent total disability benefits at some later time, we delete the words “with prejudice” from the first paragraph of the decretal portion of the order appealed here. Davis v. Bonded Transportation, Inc., 573 So.2d 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). We affirm the order as modified.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. BE & K Construction, 681 So. 2d 871, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10936, 1996 WL 600381 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
681 So. 2d 871 (Mathis v. BE & K Construction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
681 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)