Mathis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mathis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

131 S.E.2d 146, 107 Ga. App. 757, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 973

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 10, 1963·No. 40087·Published

Opinion

Bell, Judge.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the finding by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation that the claimant was not the legal widow of the deceased employee. The board did not err in denying compensation to the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

Carlisle, P. J., and Hall, J., concur. George L. Wheeler, Jr., William M. Redman, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Smith, Field, Ringel, Martin ■& Carr, Richard D. Carr, Willis-ton C. White, H. A. Stephens, Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Judge.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the finding by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation that the claimant was not the legal widow of the deceased employee. The board did not err in denying compensation to the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

Carlisle, P. J., and Hall, J., concur. George L. Wheeler, Jr., William M. Redman, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Smith, Field, Ringel, Martin ■& Carr, Richard D. Carr, Willis-ton C. White, H. A. Stephens, Jr., contra.

Mathis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 131 S.E.2d 146, 107 Ga. App. 757, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 973 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

131 S.E.2d 146 (Mathis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.