Mathilda Fioravanti v. Quirino Fioravanti
This text of 231 F.2d 776 (Mathilda Fioravanti v. Quirino Fioravanti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question is whether the District Court may in its discretion reduce or cancel, at a later date, periodic installments of payments for maintenance as of the date when application for such relief is made. We re-affirm our decision in Dausuel v. Dausuel, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 275, 276, 195 F.2d 774, 775, that the court may do so. Cf. Kephart v. Kephart, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 380, 193 F.2d 677, 684, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 944, 72 S.Ct. 557, 96 L.Ed. 702; 6 A.L.R.2d 1277, 1328.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 F.2d 776, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 23, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathilda-fioravanti-v-quirino-fioravanti-cadc-1956.