Mathilda D. Fioravanti v. Quirino Fioravanti
This text of 200 F.2d 750 (Mathilda D. Fioravanti v. Quirino Fioravanti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
91 U.S.App.D.C. 418
Mathilda D. FIORAVANTI, Appellant,
v.
Quirino FIORAVANTI, Appellee.
No. 11430.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 9, 1952.
Decided Dec. 22, 1952.
Nathan M. Lubar, Washington, D.C., with whom Leonard S. Melrod, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Charles S. Sures, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance in behalf of the appellant.
Alvin L. Newmyer, Washington, D.C., with whom Armand Newmyer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee. David G. Bress, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance in behalf of the appellee.
Before CLARK, WILBUR K. MILLER and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the proceedings below. Judge Matthews1 correctly construed the agreement between the parties. The judgment is accordingly
Affirmed.
No opinion for publication
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 F.2d 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathilda-d-fioravanti-v-quirino-fioravanti-cadc-1952.