Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mathieu v. State

Mathieu v. State

97 So. 3d 325, 2012 WL 4033688, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15448
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 14, 2012
DocketNo. 5D12-2142
StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 3d 325 (Mathieu v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathieu v. State, 97 So. 3d 325, 2012 WL 4033688, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15448 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED without prejudice to the appellant to file a facially sufficient motion in the trial court, in the event that his earlier 2011 rule 3.800(a) motion was also found to be facially insufficient. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 n. 2 (Fla.2011).

PALMER, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
60 So. 3d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 So. 3d 325, 2012 WL 4033688, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathieu-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.