Mathieu v. Frankel
This text of 33 A.D.2d 551 (Mathieu v. Frankel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The part of the order entered April 29, 1969, denying plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain the sale of shares pertaining to the apartment occupied by plaintiff is unanimously reversed on the law and facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the part of the order granting defendants’ cross motion by answering affidavit to dismiss the complaint is unanimously reversed on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, the motion for a temporary injunction granted, and the cross motion to dismiss the complaint denied. It appears plaintiff did have an option to purchase shares and a proprietary lease. Whether the option was extended, expired or was exercised, in the circumstances, presents issues of fact. Pending their resolution, the status quo should be maintained, absent a showing by defendants of irreparable damage. Upon joinder of issue, plaintiff shall promptly file a note of issue and pay the proper fees, and consent to an immediate trial. Upon plaintiff’s failure to comply with said provisions, defendants may apply for a reconsideration of plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction. (See B. C. Morton New York City Corp. v. Wolfson, 15 A D 2d 645.) Settle order on notice providing for a bond. Concur— Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, Markewich, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A.D.2d 551, 304 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathieu-v-frankel-nyappdiv-1969.