MATHIEU LACAILE v. PATRICK LESUR
This text of MATHIEU LACAILE v. PATRICK LESUR (MATHIEU LACAILE v. PATRICK LESUR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 19, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1248 Lower Tribunal No. 20-8809 ________________
Mathieu Lacaile, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Patrick Lesur, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge.
Entin Law Group, P.A., and Joshua M. Entin (Fort Lauderdale); Clark Hill PLC, and K.J. Edward Fornell (Detroit, MI), for appellants.
Paul A. McKenna & Associates, P.A., and Andrew H. Braaksma, for appellees.
Before LOGUE, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.
LOGUE, J.
We affirm without extended discussion the trial court’s order denying
the appellants’ motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. The trial court’s well-reasoned discussion of the private and public interest factors compels
affirmance. In affirming, however, we expressly disapprove those portions of
the order finding that Michigan is not an adequate alternative forum.
“[A]n alternative forum does not have to be equivalent to the chosen
forum to be adequate.” Cortez v. Palace Resorts, Inc., 123 So. 3d 1085, 1092
(Fla. 2013). Instead, dismissal is inappropriate “where the alternative forum
does not permit litigation of the subject matter of the dispute.” Kinney Sys.,
Inc. v. Cont’l Ins. Co., 674 So. 2d 86, 90 (Fla. 1996).
While Michigan does not have a specific equivalent statute for judicial
expulsion of a member from a limited liability company, there is nothing in
section 605.0602, Florida Statutes, that would prevent another jurisdiction
from enforcing its provisions. We have no doubt that our respected
counterparts in Michigan are equally capable of interpreting and applying
Florida law. See, e.g., Zantop Int’l Airlines, Inc. v. Eastern Airlines, 503 N.W.
2d 915, 919–22 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993) (applying Florida indemnification law);
Klingman Furniture Co. v. Leslie E. Tassell Tr., No. 282727, 2009 WL
350871 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009) (applying Florida statute in case involving
Florida estate).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MATHIEU LACAILE v. PATRICK LESUR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathieu-lacaile-v-patrick-lesur-fladistctapp-2021.