Mathieson v. Industrial Commission

512 P.2d 857, 20 Ariz. App. 325, 1973 Ariz. App. LEXIS 717
Court of Appeals of Arizona·Decided July 31, 1973·No. No. 1 CA-IC 731·Published

Opinion

HAIRE, Judge.

On this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission in a workmen’s compensation proceeding, the petitioning workman contends that an injury to his shoulder which left him with a residual impairment constituting a 20% functional loss of use of the left arm should have been treated as an unscheduled disability. We have reviewed the record and find that the evidence supports the scheduled award entered by the Commission. See Arnott v. Industrial Commission, 103 Ariz. 182, 438 P.2d 419 (1968); Bradley v. Industrial Commission, 13 Ariz.App. 204, 475 P.2d 296 (1970); Heredia v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App. 507, 460 P.2d 43 (1969); Pena v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz. App. 573, 460 P.2d 1002 (1969).

The award is affirmed.

JACOBSON, Chief Judge, Division 1, and EUBANK, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mathieson v. Industrial Commission, 512 P.2d 857, 20 Ariz. App. 325, 1973 Ariz. App. LEXIS 717 (Ark. Ct. App. 1973).

512 P.2d 857 (Mathieson v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heredia v. Industrial Commission
460 P.2d 43 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1969)
Pena v. Industrial Commission
460 P.2d 1002 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1969)
Arnott v. Industrial Commission
438 P.2d 419 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1968)
Bradley v. Industrial Commission
475 P.2d 296 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1970)