Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc.
532 U.S. 903, 121 S. Ct. 1224
Opinion
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions:
“1. Whether a state commission’s action relating to the enforcement of a previously approved §252 interconnection agreement is a ‘determination under [§252]’ and thus is reviewable in federal court under 47 U. S. C. § 252(e)(6)?
"2. Whether a state commission’s acceptance of Congress’ invitation to participate in implementing a federal regulatory scheme that provides that state commission determinations are reviewable in federal court constitutes a waiver of Eleventh Amendment immunity?
“3. Whether an official capacity action seeking prospective relief against state public utility commissioners for alleged ongoing violations of federal law in performing federal regulatory functions under the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 can be maintained under the Ex parte Young doctrine?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc., 532 U.S. 903, 121 S. Ct. 1224 (2001).
532 U.S. 903 (Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland
535 U.S. 635 (Supreme Court, 2002)
New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Conversent Communications of Rhode Island, L.L.C.
178 F. Supp. 2d 81 (D. Rhode Island, 2001)
MCI Telecommunication Corp. v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.
271 F.3d 491 (Third Circuit, 2001)
Mci Telecommunication Corporation v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania
271 F.3d 491 (Third Circuit, 2001)
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Bie
216 F. Supp. 2d 864 (W.D. Wisconsin, 2001)
Global Naps, Inc. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
156 F. Supp. 2d 72 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. ICG Telecom Group, Inc.
171 F. Supp. 2d 721 (S.D. Ohio, 2001)
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Sprint-Florida, Inc.
139 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (N.D. Florida, 2001)