Mathias v. Uniroyal, Inc.

660 So. 2d 742, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255, 1995 WL 454000
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1995
DocketNo. 94-2596
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 660 So. 2d 742 (Mathias v. Uniroyal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathias v. Uniroyal, Inc., 660 So. 2d 742, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255, 1995 WL 454000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

“The awarding of costs is within the trial court’s discretion, ...” Digital Systems of Fla. v. Committe, 472 So.2d 533, 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 482 So.2d 348 (Fla.1986). In the instant case, the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in not taxing the costs of certain depositions. See Digital Systems, 472 So.2d at 537; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mazzouccolo v. Gardner, McLain & Perlman
714 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 So. 2d 742, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255, 1995 WL 454000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathias-v-uniroyal-inc-fladistctapp-1995.