Mathias v. Uniroyal, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mathias v. Uniroyal, Inc.

660 So. 2d 742, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255, 1995 WL 454000

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1995·No. No. 94-2596·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

“The awarding of costs is within the trial court’s discretion, ...” Digital Systems of Fla. v. Committe, 472 So.2d 533, 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 482 So.2d 348 (Fla.1986). In the instant case, the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in not taxing the costs of certain depositions. See Digital Systems, 472 So.2d at 537; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

“The awarding of costs is within the trial court’s discretion, ...” Digital Systems of Fla. v. Committe, 472 So.2d 533, 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 482 So.2d 348 (Fla.1986). In the instant case, the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in not taxing the costs of certain depositions. See Digital Systems, 472 So.2d at 537; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Mathias v. Uniroyal, Inc., 660 So. 2d 742, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255, 1995 WL 454000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

660 So. 2d 742 (Mathias v. Uniroyal, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related