Mathey v. State

488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1129, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7835
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1655
StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 636 (Mathey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathey v. State, 488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1129, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for a continuance of his sentencing. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, WALDEN, and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1129, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathey-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.