Mathewson v. Belmont Flouring Mill Co.

1 Ga. L. Rep. 363
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 30, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 363 (Mathewson v. Belmont Flouring Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathewson v. Belmont Flouring Mill Co., 1 Ga. L. Rep. 363 (Ga. 1886).

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

Where brokers, on behalf of a firm, ordered certain flour, with the direction “ship as soon, as'you can, 45 days’ draft to B. Dub & Co.,” and the flour was sent, and a draft was sent with the bill •of lading, and an invoice stating the terms as forty-five days’acceptance, the signing and return of the draft was a condition precedent to the passing of title; and where before so doing the firm made an assignment, the assignee took no more title than they had, and the vendor could recover the property in an action of trover. Benj. on Sales (Cor-bin’s ed. 1884) p. 341 343’; 15 Gray, 229 ; 123 Mass., 143; 126 Id., 482/ Benj. on Sales, p. 344, 343, 504, 502“ 508; 13 Iowa, 238.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armour v. Pecker
123 Mass. 143 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)
Davenport Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of Davenport
13 Iowa 229 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathewson-v-belmont-flouring-mill-co-ga-1886.