Mathews v. Young.

39 P. 387, 2 Okla. 616
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 16, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 39 P. 387 (Mathews v. Young.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathews v. Young., 39 P. 387, 2 Okla. 616 (Okla. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This was a suit in equity by defendant in error to have a trust declared in certain lots in the city of Guthrie, and to require the plaintiff in error, who held the legal title, to convey to him.

A demurrer was filed to the petition objecting to the jurisdiction of the court and for reason that the same does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The demurrer was overruled and exceptions saved by the defendant.

Issues were closed, a trial had and finding and judgment for the plaintiff. The complaint and demurrer present the same question that was decided by this court in the case of Twine vs. Carey, reported in 37 Pac. 1096, and on the authority of that case the demurrer should have been sustained to the petition.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and cause is remanded to said court with instructions to sustain the demurrer to the petition and dismiss the suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Twine v. Carey
1894 OK 41 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 P. 387, 2 Okla. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-young-okla-1895.