Mathews v. Ward
This text of 1923 OK 921 (Mathews v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
H. B. Brown, administrator of the estate of Paul Ward, deceased, filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding and for grounds alleges: That Paul Ward died on or about the 28th day of July, 1922 and H. B. Brown was appointed administrator of the estate, and since August, 1922, more than one year has expired since the death of said Ward, and no steps have been taken by the plaintiff in error to revive said cause in the name of the administrator. Notice of said motion was duly served, and no response has been filed thereto. The facts in this case come squarely within the facts in the ease of Hester v. Gilbert, 43 Okla. 400, 143 Pac. 189. Upon authority of said cause, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1923 OK 921, 220 P. 342, 96 Okla. 68, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-ward-okla-1923.