Mathews v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Mathews v. State

1919 OK CR 75, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 686, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 4, 1919

DocketNo. A-3127.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 75 (Mathews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathews v. State, 1919 OK CR 75, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 686, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Homer Mathews, was convicted in the district court of Muskogee county on an information' charging that in said county on the 26th day of December, 1916, he did commit the crime of assault with intent to kill one G. O. Poole, by attempting *687 to shoot him with a pistol. His punishment was fixed at six years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court on September 5, 1917, a petition in error with ease-made.

Plaintiff in error by his counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which motion is hereby sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed and the cause remanded to the district court of Muskogee county, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Homer Mathews, was convicted in the district court of Muskogee county on an information' charging that in said county on the 26th day of December, 1916, he did commit the crime of assault with intent to kill one G. O. Poole, by attempting *687 to shoot him with a pistol. His punishment was fixed at six years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court on September 5, 1917, a petition in error with ease-made.

Plaintiff in error by his counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which motion is hereby sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed and the cause remanded to the district court of Muskogee county, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 75, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 686, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.