Mathews v. State

59 So. 842, 102 Miss. 549
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 59 So. 842 (Mathews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathews v. State, 59 So. 842, 102 Miss. 549 (Mich. 1912).

Opinion

Reed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant, a negro boy fourteen years of age, was convicted of stealing a diamond pin from Mrs. Heath, which she valued at about three hundred and 'fifty dollars.

It is shown that Mrs. Heath wore the pin at all times, during the night as well as the day. The pin was lost on a certain morning in September, 1910. Mrs. Heath testified that she placed the pin on a cushion in her room and went to breakfast, and when she returned to the room she missed the pin. The appellant was in the employ of Mrs. Heath, and she had directed him to sweep the hall into which her room opened. She accused the boy, and at first he denied any knowledge of the whereabouts of the pin. Having failed to get a confession from him by various promises, she sent for the town marshal, Mr. Magruder, who took him in hand. Mr. Magruder told the boy that it would be better for him to get the pin, and said that, if he would tell the truth about the pin and get it, “it would be all right,” and also said, “John, tell me all about this; I don’t want to put you in any trouble.” Mr. Magruder made two visits to the boy. It is shown by the testimony that appellant made confessions to Mr. Magruder. It is also shown that the appellant was whipped during the day by Messrs. Richmond and Heath, and that he confessed after being whipped.

The trial court erred in admitting the confessions made by appellant under the circumstances in this case. Such confessions were surely not free and. voluntary.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruffin v. State
992 So. 2d 1165 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2008)
Micah Ruffin v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2007
Jones v. State
841 So. 2d 115 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003)
Stallworth v. State
797 So. 2d 905 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2001)
Jason Daniel Jones v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2000
Sidney L. Stallworth v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1999
Morgan v. State
681 So. 2d 82 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1996)
Daryl Leonard Morgan v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992
Dunn v. State
547 So. 2d 42 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1989)
King v. State
451 So. 2d 765 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1984)
Hicks v. State
355 So. 2d 679 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1978)
Miller v. State
250 So. 2d 624 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1971)
Robinson v. State
157 So. 2d 49 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Wright v. State
22 So. 2d 1 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1945)
Fisher v. State
110 So. 361 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 So. 842, 102 Miss. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-state-miss-1912.