Mathews v. State

614 So. 2d 1230, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3916, 1993 WL 90895
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 31, 1993
DocketNo. 91-3065
StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 1230 (Mathews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathews v. State, 614 So. 2d 1230, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3916, 1993 WL 90895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, a juvenile, argues that the lower court failed to consider the factors set forth in Section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1989), and make the required written findings, before sentencing him as an adult. We agree and reverse for resen-[1231]*1231fencing. Flowers v. State, 546 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

HERSEY, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flowers v. State
546 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 1230, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3916, 1993 WL 90895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.