Mathews v. McStea
87 U.S. 646
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We are of opinion that the only question made and decided in this case against plaintiff in error was the sufficiency of the acts of the President to inaugurate a war which would render invalid this contract, and that this is one of the questions embraced by the act of February 5th, 1867. .
The motion to dismiss is, therefore,
Overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathews v. McStea, 87 U.S. 646 (1874).
87 U.S. 646 (Mathews v. McStea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mathews v. McStea
87 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1875)