Mathews v. McStea
87 U.S. 646
This text of 87 U.S. 646 (Mathews v. McStea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mathews v. McStea, 87 U.S. 646 (1874).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We are of opinion that the only question made and decided in this case against plaintiff in error was the sufficiency of the acts of the President to inaugurate a war which would render invalid this contract, and that this is one of the questions embraced by the act of February 5th, 1867. .
The motion to dismiss is, therefore,
Overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mathews v. McStea
87 U.S. 646 (Supreme Court, 1875)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
87 U.S. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-mcstea-scotus-1874.