Mathews v. Kelly
67 A. 1075, 70 N.J. Eq. 796, 4 Robb. 796, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 169
Opinion
The decree appealed from is- affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Bergen.
For affirmance—The- Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—13.
For reversal—Port—1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathews v. Kelly, 67 A. 1075, 70 N.J. Eq. 796, 4 Robb. 796, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1906).
67 A. 1075 (Mathews v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pagano v. United Jersey Bank
648 A.2d 269 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Phair v. Melosh
6 A.2d 491 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)