Mathews v. Karcher North America Inc
Opinion
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 JAMES MATHEWS, CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05732-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 v. 14 Defendant. 15
16 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Under the current scheduling order, the 17 parties were required to file proposed jury instructions, an LCR 16.1 agreed pretrial order, and 18 completed exhibit list no later than June 20, 2023. Dkt. No. 34 at 2. That date has come and gone, 19 and the parties have not filed anything. Missing deadlines—especially deadlines on the eve of 20 trial—not only violates the Court’s scheduling order but also interferes with Court administration. 21 Court staff must, for example, issue juror summonses sufficiently in advance of trial to ensure that 22 the parties will have a jury to decide their case. Here, however, the parties’ inability to adhere to 23 the Court’s scheduling order has precluded the timely accomplishment of that costly administrative 24 task. And although the Court encourages settlement efforts, “the possibility of settlement does not 1 excuse parties from deadlines.” Alcazar v. Farmer Boys Food, Inc., No. 2:20-CV-04342-RGK- 2 KS, 2021 WL 4583650, at *3 n.3 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2021); see also Wienco, Inc. v. Katahn 3 Assocs., Inc., 965 F.2d 565, 567 (7th Cir. 1992) (“[T]here is no reason that settlement negotiations 4 prevent a party from complying with scheduled court deadlines.”).
5 The parties are accordingly ORDERED to show cause no later than June 23, 2023 why 6 sanctions should not issue for their failure to comply with the Court’s scheduling order. See LCR 7 11(c); Webb v. Ackerman, No. CV-13-9112-PLA, 2017 WL 427142, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 8 2017). If the parties file their proposed jury instructions, pretrial order, and exhibit list or otherwise 9 dispose of this case by June 23, 2023, the Court will discharge this order to show cause. Should 10 the parties fail to timely respond to this Order, the Court will impose additional sanctions. 11 Dated this 21st day of June, 2023. 12 A 13 Lauren King United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathews v. Karcher North America Inc (Mathews v. Karcher North America Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.