Mathews v. Cleveland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mathews v. Cleveland

273 S.E.2d 420, 156 Ga. App. 157, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2922

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mathews v. Cleveland. Read the opinion of the Court — 159 Ga. App. 616 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 29, 1980·No. 60326·Published

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Appellant asserts as error the denial of his traverse of garnishment and failure of the court to consider the grounds of his motion to dismiss the garnishment. Held:

Affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.

Argued July 8, 1980 Decided September 29, 1980 Rehearing denied October 21, 1980. Oze R. Horton, for appellants. J. Steven Cheatwood, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

Appellant asserts as error the denial of his traverse of garnishment and failure of the court to consider the grounds of his motion to dismiss the garnishment. Held:

Affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.

Argued July 8, 1980 Decided September 29, 1980 Rehearing denied October 21, 1980. Oze R. Horton, for appellants. J. Steven Cheatwood, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

Mathews v. Cleveland, 273 S.E.2d 420, 156 Ga. App. 157, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2922 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

273 S.E.2d 420 (Mathews v. Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.