Mathews Hardware Co. v. Allied Sales Corporation

97 So. 166, 19 Ala. App. 303, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 159
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 26, 1923
Docket6 Div. 89.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 So. 166 (Mathews Hardware Co. v. Allied Sales Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathews Hardware Co. v. Allied Sales Corporation, 97 So. 166, 19 Ala. App. 303, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 159 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

This cause was tried before the judge sitting without a jury. After hearing the evidence, judgment was entered for defendant. The bill of exceptions fails to state that it contains all of the evidence, and, in fact, it affirmatively appears that copy of two orders given Iloohs Lumber Company on January 5 and 6, 1021, for shipment to Missouri Yalley Bridge & Iron Company, attached to answers of defendant to the seventh interrogatory and introduced in evidence by plaintiff, are not in the record, this being the case we cannot review the conclusions of fact arrived at by the trial judge. Gulf State Steel Co. v. Comstock, 17 Ala. App. 430, 85 South. 305; Prude v. Thompson & Thompson, 201 Ala. 595, 79 South. 21. This is the only question necessary to a decision.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Starkey v. Bryant
59 So. 2d 796 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 So. 166, 19 Ala. App. 303, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-hardware-co-v-allied-sales-corporation-alactapp-1923.