Mathew Musladin v. Anthony Lamarque, Warden
427 F.3d 647, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22732, 2005 D.A.R. 12
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2005·No. 03-16653·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonreeused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The request for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathew Musladin v. Anthony Lamarque, Warden, 427 F.3d 647, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22732, 2005 D.A.R. 12 (9th Cir. 2005).
427 F.3d 647 (Mathew Musladin v. Anthony Lamarque, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lord
165 P.3d 1251 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
Carey v. Musladin
549 U.S. 70 (Supreme Court, 2006)
Mathew Musladin v. Anthony Lamarque, Warden
427 F.3d 647 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)