Mathew Esters v. Texas Department of Transporation and STanley Yin, in His Official Capacity as Manager of the Houston District Office of Texas Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mathew Esters v. Texas Department of Transporation and STanley Yin, in His Official Capacity as Manager of the Houston District Office of Texas Department of Transportation

DecidedApril 12, 2012

Docket14-11-00977-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Mathew Esters v. Texas Department of Transporation and STanley Yin, in His Official Capacity as Manager of the Houston District Office of Texas Department of Transportation (Mathew Esters v. Texas Department of Transporation and STanley Yin, in His Official Capacity as Manager of the Houston District Office of Texas Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathew Esters v. Texas Department of Transporation and STanley Yin, in His Official Capacity as Manager of the Houston District Office of Texas Department of Transportation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Abatement Order filed April 12, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00977-CV ____________

MATHEW ESTERS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET. AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2006-43005

ABATEMENT ORDER

This court has been notified that the trial court will hold a hearing to correct alleged inaccuracies in the reporter’s record.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court=s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abatement Order filed April 12, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00977-CV ____________

MATHEW ESTERS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET. AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2006-43005

ABATEMENT ORDER

This court has been notified that the trial court will hold a hearing to correct alleged inaccuracies in the reporter’s record.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court=s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mathew Esters v. Texas Department of Transporation and STanley Yin, in His Official Capacity as Manager of the Houston District Office of Texas Department of Transportation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathew-esters-v-texas-department-of-transporation-and-stanley-yin-in-his-texapp-2012.