Matheson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Matheson v. State

1971 OK CR 479, 491 P.2d 775

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 15, 1971

DocketNo. A-17074

StatusPublished

This text of 1971 OK CR 479 (Matheson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matheson v. State, 1971 OK CR 479, 491 P.2d 775 (Okla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

Arthur T. Matheson, hereinafter referred to as defendant, entered a plea of guilty in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma to the offense of Larceny of an Automobile and received a five (5) year suspended sentence on May 3, 1968. Said suspension was ordered revoked on May 14, 1971, and from said order of revocation, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

Record reflects that the defendant, with counsel, knowingly and voluntarily entered a plea of guilty, and received a five (5) year suspended sentence, one condition of which was that he not violate any city, state or federal law. Evidence at the Revocation Hearing adduced that the defendant subsequently on March 17, 1969, was convicted in the federal court for the offense of Knowingly Transporting a Stolen Motor Vehicle in Interstate Commerce. We are of the opinion that the revocation proceedings were conducted within the guidelines set forth by this Court in the case of In re Collyar, Okl.Cr., 476 P.2d 354. The order revoking the suspension of judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

BRETT, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

Arthur T. Matheson, hereinafter referred to as defendant, entered a plea of guilty in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma to the offense of Larceny of an Automobile and received a five (5) year suspended sentence on May 3, 1968. Said suspension was ordered revoked on May 14, 1971, and from said order of revocation, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

Record reflects that the defendant, with counsel, knowingly and voluntarily entered a plea of guilty, and received a five (5) year suspended sentence, one condition of which was that he not violate any city, state or federal law. Evidence at the Revocation Hearing adduced that the defendant subsequently on March 17, 1969, was convicted in the federal court for the offense of Knowingly Transporting a Stolen Motor Vehicle in Interstate Commerce. We are of the opinion that the revocation proceedings were conducted within the guidelines set forth by this Court in the case of In re Collyar, Okl.Cr., 476 P.2d 354. The order revoking the suspension of judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

BRETT, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1971 OK CR 479, 491 P.2d 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matheson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack