Matheson v. Joy-Kar Taxi, Inc.

32 A.D.2d 544, 299 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4247
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 6, 1968, which denied his motion for reconsideration of a prior denial of a trial preference. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and trial preference granted. In our opinion, the fact that plaintiff received public assistance from the Nassau County Department of Public Welfare prior to his accident, and the fact that there is no causal relationship between his welfare status and his accident, should not, in and of themselves, deprive him of a trial preference based on indigency. To require .that there be a causal connection between plaintiff’s indigency and the incident resulting in the cause of action would be to establish an inflexible rule somewhat at odds with the “ interests of justice ” basis for granting a trial preference (see CPLR 3403, subd. [a], par. 3). The “interests of justice ” warrant a .trial preference at bar. Christ, Acting F. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matheson v. Joy-Kar Taxi, Inc., 32 A.D.2d 544, 299 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 544 (Matheson v. Joy-Kar Taxi, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biengardo v. Ter Bush
54 A.D.2d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Brenton v. Tiripicchio
54 A.D.2d 571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)