Matherson v. McNab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matherson v. McNab

96 A.D.2d 920, 465 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 920 (Matherson v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matherson v. McNab, 96 A.D.2d 920, 465 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Robert W. Matherson as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 13,1983, for the office of County Executive, Suffolk County, Robert W. Matherson appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated August 22.1983, which dismissed the application on the merits, and Anthony Grancio appeals from an order of the same court, dated August 22, 1983, which denied his motion to dismiss the application for failure to join and serve him as an indispensable and necessary party to the proceeding. Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241). Anthony Grancio is not aggrieved by the judgment (CPLR 5511). The issues [921]*921raised by him are brought up for review and have been considered on Robert W. Matherson’s appeal (CPLR 5501, subd [al). Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to validate a petition designating Robert W. Matherson as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 13,1983, for the office of County Executive, Suffolk County, Robert W. Matherson appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated August 22.1983, which dismissed the application on the merits, and Anthony Grancio appeals from an order of the same court, dated August 22, 1983, which denied his motion to dismiss the application for failure to join and serve him as an indispensable and necessary party to the proceeding. Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241). Anthony Grancio is not aggrieved by the judgment (CPLR 5511). The issues [921]*921raised by him are brought up for review and have been considered on Robert W. Matherson’s appeal (CPLR 5501, subd [al). Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 920, 465 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matherson-v-mcnab-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack