Matherly v. State
This text of 704 So. 2d 563 (Matherly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following his conviction for the third-degree felony of misapplication of construction [564]*564funds in violation of section 713.345(l)(b)3, Florida Statutes (1993), appellant seeks review, raising a number of issues. Only one merits discussion. Appellant claims that section 713.345(l)(b) is facially unconstitutional because it violates Florida’s constitutional prohibition of imprisonment for debt without proof of fraud. We affirm as to this issue based upon the well-reasoned opinion in Weber v. State, 649 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We affirm as to the remaining issues without discussion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 So. 2d 563, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6566, 1997 WL 329123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matherly-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.