Matheny v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

235 So. 2d 690, 45 A.L.R. 3d 1343, 1970 Miss. LEXIS 1457
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMay 25, 1970
DocketNo. 45778
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 So. 2d 690 (Matheny v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matheny v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance, 235 So. 2d 690, 45 A.L.R. 3d 1343, 1970 Miss. LEXIS 1457 (Mich. 1970).

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Appellants, Dalton R. Matheny and Mrs. Arnold Franklin, the beneficiaries in a life insurance policy on the life of James R. Jordan, brought suit in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi, against appellee, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, to recover the sum of $80,000, the face amount of the policy with accidental death benefits. The chancellor found that the policy had lapsed for nonpayment of premium and dismissed the' bill of complaint. The appellants appeal.

Dalton R. Matheny and James R. Jordan were partners in the restaurant business. Jordan operated the Billups Restaurant near Jackson, Mississippi, and Matheny operated the Billups Restaurant near Alexandria, Louisiana. U. Grey Flowers, a soliciting agent for appellee, who worked out of the E. W. Hughes General Agency in Jackson, Mississippi, sold two life insurance policies to the partnership. Ma-theny owned the policy on Jordan’s life, and Jordan owned the policy on Matheny’s life. Both policies were in the same face amount, and all premiums for both policies were to be paid out of the partnership bank account in the Deposit Guaranty National Bank in Jackson, Mississippi.

After the partners finally determined what kind and type of policies they desired and after the initial premiums had been paid, Matheny and Jordan both signed a “Request for Triple M Plan” of premium payment. Both Requests were dated January 8, 1963, and the Triple M Plan for [691]*691the policy on the life of Matheny was signed by Jordan as depositor and Jordan as owner. The Triple M Plan for the policy on the life of James R. Jordan was signed by Jordan as depositor and Ma-theny as owner. Both requests listed the same bank account, “40-338-61, Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Company, Jackson, Mississippi,” as the partnership account on which appellee should draw checks in payment of monthly premiums.

Each request, identical in language, recited :

“Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company of Springfield, Massachusetts, is requested to draw checks on the account of the undersigned depositor in the bank named under the Company’s Triple M Plan for the purpose of paying premiums on the policies shown below, subject to the following conditions: (1) Premiums shall be payable monthly and the Company shall not be required to give notice of premiums becoming due. (2) One check shall be drawn on a fixed date for the total of all premiums due during the month under the plan. (3) The total amount of premiums due shall not be less than $10.00 a month. (4) Any election of the Automatic Premium Loan provision or the Reduction of Premium divident option shall be inoperative while premiums are payable monthly. (5) The policies may be removed from the Triple M Plan if within any one year period any tivo checks are not paid upon presentation. (6) The Triple M Plan may be terminated by the premium payor or by the Company by providing the other party with thirty days written notice of such termination.” (Emphasis added).

The monthly premium on the Jordan policy was $52.80 per month, Jordan being much younger than Matheny; the monthly premium on the Matheny policy was $108.-19 a month. In order to preserve the 34-year insurable age of Jordan (which would result in a substantial saving to the partnership), the appellee was requested to backdate the policy to September 24, 1962, in the application therefor, the application being signed, by James R. Jordan as the insured and Dalton R. Matheny as the purchaser. Appellee dated the policy September 24, 1962, as requested, and the application was attached to and made a part of the policy on the life of Jordan. The policy on the life of Matheny was dated December 20, 1962.

Realizing that it would take some time to investigate and pass on the applications for insurance and the requests for special plans of premium payment, and to issue the policies, the initial premiums were paid by partnership checks drawn by Jordan and handled by the E. W. Hughes Agency, the general agency of the appellee in Jackson, Mississippi. In balancing out the premium payments made through it, the Hughes Agency refunded $7.66 to James R. Jordan and $11.40 to Dalton R. Matheny. This was done by agency checks which were accepted and' cashed by Jordan and Ma-theny. Beginning January 8, 1963, all premium payments were made to Massachusetts Mutual and all transactions were handled through the home office of Massachusetts Mutual in Springfield, Massachusetts. The “Bank Authorization to Honor Checks Drawn by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company” signed by “J. R. Jordan” on January 8, 1963, contained this language:

“Such authority shall remain in effect until revoked by the undersigned in writing and until you receive such notice, it is agreed that you shall be fully protected. You shall be under no liability whatsoever if any such check be dishonored, whether with or without cause, and whether intentionally or inadvertently even though such action results in forfeiture of insurance.” (Emphasis added).

On March 1, 1963, the appellee drew a draft on the partnership account in the Deposit Guaranty for $216.38 to pay the premiums due January 20 and February [692]*69220, 1963, on the Matheny policy and on March 15, 1963, the appellee drew a draft on the partnership account for $52.80 to cover the premium due February 24, 1963, on the Jordan policy. These drafts were honored by the bank, and premiums were thus paid to March 20, 1963, on the Ma-theny policy and to March 24, 1963, on the Jordan policy. Both policies and the requested plans of payment were now “in cycle” and henceforth, in accordance with the plan, one draft would be drawn on the bank to cover both monthly premiums.

On March 20, 1963, the appellee at its home office in Springfield, Massachusetts, drew a draft on the partnership account in the Deposit Guaranty Bank for $160.99, covering the monthly premium of $108.19 due March 20, 1963, on the Matheny policy and the monthly premium of $52.80 due March 24, 1963, on the Jordan policy. On March 29, 1963, this check was returned unpaid by the Deposit Guaranty because of insufficient funds in the partnership account, and the partnership account was charged an additional $2.00 service charge by the bank.

On April 5, 1963, the appellee drew a second draft for $160.99 to cover the March, 1963, premiums on both policies. This check was also dishonored because of insufficient funds and was returned to the appellee at its home office on April 23, 1963. The partnership account was again charged a special $2.00 service charge by the bank.

On April 22, 1963, before the second draft was returned unpaid, Massachusetts Mutual drew a third draft for $160.99 for the April, 1963, premiums on both policies; this check was likewise dishonored because of insufficient funds in the partnership account and was returned to the ap-pellee in Springfield, Massachusetts, on May 3, 1963. Again the partnership account in the Deposit Guaranty was charged with a special $2.00 service charge for the third bad check.

The life policy on Jordan lapsed on April 24, 1963, when the 31-day grace period expired. The 31-day grace period for the life policy on Matheny also expiring, that policy lapsed on April 20, 1963.

Each policy contained this reinstatement clause:

“Reinstatement. This policy may be reinstated during the lifetime of the insured

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pasco Enterprises, Inc. v. Southland Ins. Agency, Inc.
408 So. 2d 63 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 So. 2d 690, 45 A.L.R. 3d 1343, 1970 Miss. LEXIS 1457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matheny-v-massachusetts-mutual-life-insurance-miss-1970.