Matharu v. Muir

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Matharu v. Muir

73 A.3d 576

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 22, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 A.3d 576 (Matharu v. Muir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matharu v. Muir, 73 A.3d 576 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is [577]*577REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012).

Petitioners’ Application to Remand this Matter to Superior Court for Reconsideration in Light of Seebold, is DISMISSED as moot.

Justice Baer dissents and would deny the allocatur petition as he views Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012) as distinguishable from this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is [577]*577REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012).

Petitioners’ Application to Remand this Matter to Superior Court for Reconsideration in Light of Seebold, is DISMISSED as moot.

Justice Baer dissents and would deny the allocatur petition as he views Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012) as distinguishable from this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.3d 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matharu-v-muir-pa-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack