Mateyka v. Reischmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mateyka v. Reischmann

264 A.D. 752, 34 N.Y.S.2d 617

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 752 (Mateyka v. Reischmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mateyka v. Reischmann, 264 A.D. 752, 34 N.Y.S.2d 617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We interpret the interlocutory judgment to mean that on tli accounting plaintiff is entitled to one-third of the assets of the partnership afta crediting each partner with the amount of such partner’s capital contribution! As so interpreted, we think the judgment is correct.

The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We interpret the interlocutory judgment to mean that on tli accounting plaintiff is entitled to one-third of the assets of the partnership afta crediting each partner with the amount of such partner’s capital contribution! As so interpreted, we think the judgment is correct.

The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 752, 34 N.Y.S.2d 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mateyka-v-reischmann-nyappdiv-1942.