Materka v. Erie Railroad

95 A. 612, 88 N.J.L. 372, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 331

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The' judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For afjwmance—Ti-ie Chancelloe, Gabbison, Swayze, Tbenohabd, Bergen, Mintuen, Black, Heppenheimbe, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 10.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Materka v. Erie Railroad, 95 A. 612, 88 N.J.L. 372, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 331 (N.J. 1915).

Pincite

95 A. 612 (Materka v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.