Materka v. Erie Railroad
95 A. 612, 88 N.J.L. 372, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 331
This text of 95 A. 612 (Materka v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Materka v. Erie Railroad, 95 A. 612, 88 N.J.L. 372, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 331 (N.J. 1915).
Opinion
The' judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.
For afjwmance—Ti-ie Chancelloe, Gabbison, Swayze, Tbenohabd, Bergen, Mintuen, Black, Heppenheimbe, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schmidt ex rel. Schmidt v. Stone
194 N.W. 917 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 A. 612, 88 N.J.L. 372, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/materka-v-erie-railroad-nj-1915.