Mateo v. United States

310 F.3d 39

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mateo v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 398 F.3d 126 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided November 22, 2002·No. 02-1645·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 02-1645

FELIX MATEO, a/k/a Manuel Lluberes, Johnny Rodriguez,

Petitioner, Appellant,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on November 7, 2002, should

be amended as follows:

On page 4, 3rd line of 2nd full paragraph, insert "rule of

constitutional" between "new" and "law".

On page 5, 7th line down, replace "7th" with "7th".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 02-1645

FELIX MATEO, a/k/a Manuel Lluberes, Johnny Rodriguez,

Petitioner, Appellant,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on November 7, 2002, should

be amended as follows:

On page 4, 3rd line of 2nd full paragraph, insert "rule of

constitutional" between "new" and "law".

On page 5, 7th line down, replace "7th" with "7th".

Mateo v. United States, 310 F.3d 39 (1st Cir. 2002).

Pincite

310 F.3d 39 (Mateo v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

398 F.3d 126 (First Circuit, 2005)

125 F. App'x 318 (First Circuit, 2005)

436 F.3d 9 (First Circuit, 2006)

314 F.3d 698 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)