Mateo v. State

442 S.W.3d 921, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1065, 2014 WL 4722758
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2014·No. No. WD 75728·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, Wilber Mateo was convicted in the Circuit Court of Jackson County of three counts of endangering the welfare of a child, three counts of child abuse, and one count of first-degree assault. He appeals the judgment of the circuit court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Mateo contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the testimony of a social worker concerning the truthfulness of the victim’s pre-trial statements. Mateo also claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s closing argument, which asserted that the victim’s injuries must have been caused by a left-handed person, and that Mateo was left-handed based on observation of his note-taking during the trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mateo v. State, 442 S.W.3d 921, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1065, 2014 WL 4722758 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

442 S.W.3d 921 (Mateo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.