Mateo v. State
This text of 979 So. 2d 1146 (Mateo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alberto V. MATEO, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Alberto V. Mateo, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Richard Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
*1147 Before RAMIREZ, CORTIÑAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We grant Alberto V. Mateo's petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on his Motion for Post Conviction Relief, filed on November 29, 2006.
As we are hopeful that the lower court will comply forthwith, we withhold issuance of the formal writ for thirty (30) days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
979 So. 2d 1146, 2008 WL 1734182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mateo-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.