Mateo Fabian Gomez Garza v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 16, 2020
Docket13-19-00607-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Mateo Fabian Gomez Garza v. State (Mateo Fabian Gomez Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mateo Fabian Gomez Garza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00607-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MATEO FABIAN GOMEZ GARZA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

The reporter’s records submitted to this court appear incomplete. The honorable

court reporter Jacqueline Inks has been granted several requests for extension.

Furthermore, on August 17, 2020 notice was sent to the trial court’s official reporter, Mark

Kvapil and the honorable Jacqueline Inks notifying each of the missing volumes. To date,

volumes 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, and 23 have not been received by the clerk of this court. This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further

delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly, this

appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f)(4), the trial court is

directed to conduct a hearing to determine if: (1) the appellant has timely requested a

reporter's record; (2) without the appellant's fault, a significant exhibit or a significant

portion of the court reporter's notes and records has been lost or destroyed or - if the

proceedings were electronically recorded - a significant portion of the recording has been

lost or destroyed or is inaudible; (3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the

reporter's record, or the lost and destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal's resolution;

and (4) the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced

by agreement of the parties, or the lost or destroyed exhibit cannot be replaced either by

agreement of the parties or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately

duplicate with reasonable certainty the original exhibit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f).

The trial court is directed to forward the record of the proceedings, including any

orders and findings, to this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or to

notify this Court within such period indicating a date by which the trial court can comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX R. APP. P. 42.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 16th day of October, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mateo Fabian Gomez Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mateo-fabian-gomez-garza-v-state-texapp-2020.