Mateflex-Mele Corp. v. Swarzman
71 A.D.2d 1055, 421 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13440
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 1979
StatusPublished
This text of 71 A.D.2d 1055 (Mateflex-Mele Corp. v. Swarzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mateflex-Mele Corp. v. Swarzman, 71 A.D.2d 1055, 421 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Stone, J. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court— [1056]*1056vacate default.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.2d 1055, 421 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mateflex-mele-corp-v-swarzman-nyappdiv-1979.