Matczak v. Novick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matczak v. Novick

104 A.D.2d 932, 480 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20375

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.2d 932 (Matczak v. Novick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matczak v. Novick, 104 A.D.2d 932, 480 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for a declaratory judgment that an option to extend a lease is a nullity, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated October 3,1983, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Order modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto declaring that the “Rider to Lease” dated September 1, 1981 constituted, inter alia, a valid option to defendants to extend the lease in question to September 30, 1984. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the defendants (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 324, app dsmd 371 US 74, cert den 371 US 901). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for a declaratory judgment that an option to extend a lease is a nullity, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated October 3,1983, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

Order modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto declaring that the “Rider to Lease” dated September 1, 1981 constituted, inter alia, a valid option to defendants to extend the lease in question to September 30, 1984. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the defendants (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 324, app dsmd 371 US 74, cert den 371 US 901). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 932, 480 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matczak-v-novick-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack