Matassa v. Jasmine

39 So. 3d 599, 2010 La. LEXIS 1708
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 26, 2010
DocketNo. 2010-C-1729
StatusPublished

This text of 39 So. 3d 599 (Matassa v. Jasmine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matassa v. Jasmine, 39 So. 3d 599, 2010 La. LEXIS 1708 (La. 2010).

Opinion

In re Jasmine, Madeline et al.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 34,051; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CE 1298.

WRIT DENIED. Considering the Official Journal of the Constitutional Convention of 1973, providing the history of Article V, §§ 9 & 24 of the 1974 Louisiana Constitution, as well as Article VII, § 22 of the 1921 Constitution, we find the result reached by the lower courts is correct.

JOHNSON, J., concurs. VICTORY, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 So. 3d 599, 2010 La. LEXIS 1708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matassa-v-jasmine-la-2010.