Matanzas

170 F. 1020, 95 C.C.A. 671, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4786
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 25, 1909·No. No. 264·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There seems to be more than the usual number of contradictions, inconsistencies, and untrustworthy estimates in this record. We are not inclined to reverse the findings of fact or the conclusions of the District Judge who heard all the libelant’s witnesses and the more important ones called by the claimant. Decree affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matanzas, 170 F. 1020, 95 C.C.A. 671, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4786 (2d Cir. 1909).

170 F. 1020 (Matanzas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.