Masu v. Blumenstein
This text of 32 Misc. 691 (Masu v. Blumenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal was argued before the February Appellate Term, and the judgment affirmed. A motion was subsequently made for a reargument upon the ground that the record contained no evidence as to the residence of the defendants, and hence that the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction of the action, and that this ground for reversal, although stated in appellants’ brief, had apparently been overlooked by the court. The Court of Appeals has now held that the Municipal Courts have jurisdiction of actions against nonresidents, thus overruling the decisions to' the contrary of this court and the Appellate Division in the second department. Worthington v. London, etc., Company, 164 N. Y. 81.
It follows that the judgment was properly affirmed.
Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed. A ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Misc. 691, 66 N.Y.S. 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masu-v-blumenstein-nyappterm-1900.