Mastros v. Mastros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mastros v. Mastros

54 A.D.2d 675, 388 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14209

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 675 (Mastros v. Mastros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mastros v. Mastros, 54 A.D.2d 675, 388 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 17, 1975, which granted the plaintiff wife’s application for divorce and denied the defendant husband’s counterclaim for a divorce and awarded alimony to the wife in the sum of $85 per week unanimously modified on the law, and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of reducing the award for permanent alimony to $65 per week, and otherwise affirmed without costs or disbursements. Upon the record before us, giving due consideration to all of the relevant circumstances, the award of alimony was excessive and should be reduced to the extent provided for herein. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 17, 1975, which granted the plaintiff wife’s application for divorce and denied the defendant husband’s counterclaim for a divorce and awarded alimony to the wife in the sum of $85 per week unanimously modified on the law, and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of reducing the award for permanent alimony to $65 per week, and otherwise affirmed without costs or disbursements. Upon the record before us, giving due consideration to all of the relevant circumstances, the award of alimony was excessive and should be reduced to the extent provided for herein. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 675, 388 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastros-v-mastros-nyappdiv-1976.