Mastromoro v. Burdick

100 A.D.2d 746, 473 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17761

This text of 100 A.D.2d 746 (Mastromoro v. Burdick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mastromoro v. Burdick, 100 A.D.2d 746, 473 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: No certificate of nomination was required to be filed since the persons designated for the uncontested offices were deemed nominated (Election Law, § 6-160, subd 2). We do not reach the question of the validity of the designating petition of a person not an enrolled member of the political party designating him, since this issue was not raised below. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Tenney, J. — Election Law.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Feb. 27, 1984.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.2d 746, 473 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastromoro-v-burdick-nyappdiv-1984.