Mastromoro v. Burdick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mastromoro v. Burdick

100 A.D.2d 746, 473 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17761

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 1984·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: No certificate of nomination was required to be filed since the persons designated for the uncontested offices were deemed nominated (Election Law, § 6-160, subd 2). We do not reach the question of the validity of the designating petition of a person not an enrolled member of the political party designating him, since this issue was not raised below. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Tenney, J. — Election Law.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Feb. 27, 1984.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: No certificate of nomination was required to be filed since the persons designated for the uncontested offices were deemed nominated (Election Law, § 6-160, subd 2). We do not reach the question of the validity of the designating petition of a person not an enrolled member of the political party designating him, since this issue was not raised below. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Tenney, J. — Election Law.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Feb. 27, 1984.)

Mastromoro v. Burdick, 100 A.D.2d 746, 473 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

100 A.D.2d 746 (Mastromoro v. Burdick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.