Mastrocola v. Wood

248 A.D. 592

This text of 248 A.D. 592 (Mastrocola v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mastrocola v. Wood, 248 A.D. 592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Action by the plaintiffs in their capacity as clients of the individual defendants for damages because of alleged fraud, actual or constructive, as a consequence of certain dealings in reference to several parcels of real estate and incumbrances thereon. Order granting motion of the defendants for judgment on the pleadings and judgment entered pursuant thereto reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Considering the complaint solely as a pleading and without regard to the merits of the defenses interposed, the first four causes of action therein stated are sufficient, although the fifth and sixth causes of action are insufficient in law. There are allegations in the first four causes of action which are irrelevant and have no proper place therein. The pleading is poorly drawn, but contains enough substance to withstand an assertion that it fails to state a cause or causes of action, at least so far as the first four set out are concerned. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastrocola-v-wood-nyappdiv-1936.