Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Emenee Industries, Inc.
197 N.E.2d 620, 14 N.Y.2d 498, 248 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1356
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. Judges Fuld and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action under the Lanham Act.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Emenee Industries, Inc., 197 N.E.2d 620, 14 N.Y.2d 498, 248 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1356 (N.Y. 1964).
197 N.E.2d 620 (Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Emenee Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thermocarbon, Inc. v. Dicing Technology, Inc.
567 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Paul Smith, an Individual v. Edward L. Montoro and Film Ventures International Inc.
648 F.2d 602 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Commodore Import Corp. v. Hiraoka & Co., Ltd.
422 F. Supp. 628 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Pezon Et Michel v. Ernest R. Hewin Associates, Inc.
270 F. Supp. 423 (S.D. New York, 1967)
American Optical Company v. Rayex Corporation
266 F. Supp. 342 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Blazon, Inc. v. DeLuxe Game Corp.
268 F. Supp. 416 (S.D. New York, 1965)