Mastrion v. McKay Bros. Motors
This text of 222 A.D.2d 562 (Mastrion v. McKay Bros. Motors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated October 14, 1994, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) for a change of venue from Kings County to Rensselaer County.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
[563]*563Upon our review of the record, we agree with Supreme Court that the defendants failed to meet their burden of establishing that the convenience of material witnesses would be promoted by a change of venue to Rensselaer County (see, CPLR 510 [3]; O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D.2d 562, 636 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastrion-v-mckay-bros-motors-nyappdiv-1995.