Mastracola v. Freight Terminal Realty Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Mastracola v. Freight Terminal Realty Corp.

13 Misc. 2d 315, 179 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3036

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Misc. 2d 315 (Mastracola v. Freight Terminal Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mastracola v. Freight Terminal Realty Corp., 13 Misc. 2d 315, 179 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to the defendant, and plaintiff’s motion to open his default and to vacate the order dismissing the action and the judgment entered thereon denied, with leave to the plaintiff, if he be so advised, to make a new application for this relief upon proper papers showing that his default was not willful, but resulted from mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect (Civ. Prac. Act, § 108).

The moving papers do not set forth facts excusing the delay in placing the case on the calendar. While plaintiff says in his affidavit in support of the motion that he did not intend to abandon the action, and implies fault on the part of his former attorney, no facts are adduced to explain the failure to file a note of issue, to oppose the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, or to move to open the default until 10 months after judgment was entered dismissing the complaint.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to the defendant, and plaintiff’s motion to open his default and to vacate the order dismissing the action and the judgment entered thereon denied, with leave to the plaintiff, if he be so advised, to make a new application for this relief upon proper papers showing that his default was not willful, but resulted from mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect (Civ. Prac. Act, § 108).

The moving papers do not set forth facts excusing the delay in placing the case on the calendar. While plaintiff says in his affidavit in support of the motion that he did not intend to abandon the action, and implies fault on the part of his former attorney, no facts are adduced to explain the failure to file a note of issue, to oppose the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, or to move to open the default until 10 months after judgment was entered dismissing the complaint.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Misc. 2d 315, 179 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastracola-v-freight-terminal-realty-corp-nyappterm-1958.