Masterson, Ex Parte James Ivan Jr.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 18, 2007
DocketAP-75,664
StatusPublished

This text of Masterson, Ex Parte James Ivan Jr. (Masterson, Ex Parte James Ivan Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Masterson, Ex Parte James Ivan Jr., (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,664
EX PARTE JAMES IVAN MASTERSON, JR., Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 03-05-03783-CR(1) IN THE 359TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted of driving while intoxicated (enhanced) and sentenced to thirteen years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

This Court received Applicant's application on December 8th, 2006. Prior to this Court receiving the application, Applicant had sent a letter to both the trial court clerk and the clerk of this Court requesting that his application be withdrawn. After this Court received the application, on January 19th, 2007, the clerk of this Court received a letter from Applicant requesting that this Court not withdraw his application, but rather consider it on the merits. This Court dismissed the application on Applicant's own motion on February 7th, 2007. After reconsideration on its own motion, the Court finds that the application should have been granted on the merits. Accordingly, the Court withdraws its prior order dismissing this application and enters this opinion granting Applicant relief.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because he did not understand that one of the enhancements used to make his offense a felony was too remote to be used as an enhancement under Texas Penal Code Section 49.09(e). The trial court has determined that Applicant should be granted relief.

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 03-05-03783-CR in the 359th Judicial District Court of Montgomery County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Montgomery County to answer the charge against him.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division.



Delivered: April 18, 2007

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Masterson, Ex Parte James Ivan Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masterson-ex-parte-james-ivan-jr-texcrimapp-2007.