Masters v. Southern Express Co.
99 S.E. 144, 23 Ga. App. 642
Opinion
1. The writ of certiorari lies for the correction of errors committed by the trial court. Accordingly, the writ may not for the first time raise a point which should have been raised before the trial court, and on which that court should- have been given an opportunity to rule at the time of trial.
2. Upon the petition for certiorari and the answer thereto no error in the trial of the case is shown. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Masters v. Southern Express Co., 99 S.E. 144, 23 Ga. App. 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
99 S.E. 144 (Masters v. Southern Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Byers v. Maddox
18 S.E.2d 568 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Cohen v. Finkovitch
149 S.E. 66 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Garrett v. City of Atlanta
110 S.E. 886 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Payne v. Cheshire
108 S.E. 207 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Jones v. May
107 S.E. 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Davis v. Town of Gibson
102 S.E. 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)