Masters v. Southern Express Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Masters v. Southern Express Co.

99 S.E. 144, 23 Ga. App. 642

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 19, 1919

Docket10210

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 144 (Masters v. Southern Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Masters v. Southern Express Co., 99 S.E. 144, 23 Ga. App. 642 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The writ of certiorari lies for the correction of errors committed by the trial court. Accordingly, the writ may not for the first time raise a point which should have been raised before the trial court, and on which that court should- have been given an opportunity to rule at the time of trial.

2. Upon the petition for certiorari and the answer thereto no error in the trial of the case is shown. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI